Designated service villages growth options report - draft for stakeholder engagement Summer 2015
The report contains draft detail and recommendations for discussion as part of the Let’s Talk Plan Selby Summer engagement 2015 with stakeholders.
Designated service villages growth options report - draft for stakeholder engagement: Summer 2015 (pdf / 38 MB)
DSV workshop summary of engagement
Following the stakeholder engagement in the summer of 2015, a draft DSV Workshop Summary of Engagement report was produced.
Session 1 - 6 July 2015
Draft DSV workshop summary of engagement session 1 (pdf / 2 MB), focused around Appleton Roebuck, Church Fenton, Monk Fryston/Hillam, South Milford and Ulleskelf.
Session 2 - 7 July 2015
Draft DSV workshop summary of engagement session 2 (pdf / 900 KB), focused around Byram / Brotherton, Carlton, Eggborough / Whitley and Kellington.
Session 3 - 8 July 2015
Draft DSV workshop summary of engagement session 3 (pdf / 738 KB), focused around Brayton, Barlby / Osgodby, Thorpe Willoughby and Hambleton.
Session 4 - 9 July 2015
Draft DSV workshop summary of engagement session 4 (pdf / 843 KB), focused around Cawood, Escrick, Hemingborough, North Duffield and Riccall.
Context and summary
The Selby district core strategy (adopted in 2013) included a housing target of 2000 dwellings across 18 designated service villages. When housing completions and sites with planning permission in designated service villages since 2011 (the base date of the core strategy) on are taken off that target there is a requirement to allocate land for at least 769 new dwellings.
The designated service villages are:
- Appleton Roebuck
- Barlby and Osgodby
- Brayton
- Brotherton and Byram
- Carlton
- Cawood
- Church Fenton
- Eggborough and Whitely
- Escrick
- Hambleton
- Hemingbrough
- Kellington
- Monk Fryston and Hillam
- North Duffield
- Riccall
- South Milford
- Thorpe Willoughby
- Ulleskelf
As the single housing target was provided for all 18 designated service villages, the purpose of this study is to discuss options to distribute these dwellings across Selby’s designated service villages (DSVs).
Section 7 of the report proposes three potential options to apportion growth across the 18 settlements. It should be emphasised that the figures provided in any option are only starting points and a guide to the relative levels of growth likely to be accommodated in each village. These options have been derived from the responses received from the Plan Selby initial consultation.
Broadly these comprise:
Option 1: Proportionate dispersal across all designated service villages: The proportionate dispersal method applies a blanket application of 4.75% growth per settlement.
Option 2: Distribution based on services and accessibility: A distribution based upon services and accessibility. This study utilises our existing evidence to conduct an appraisal of each settlement in terms of the number of services and its public transport accessibility and accessibility to employment. Those settlements ranking highest following the assessment are apportioned a higher number of dwellings, and those ranking lower are apportioned a reduced number.
Option 3: Growth based on avoiding Green Belt release: The final option apportions a blanket 6.5% growth to those designated service villages, not within Green Belt.
- completions and outstanding plots with planning permission 1st April 2015 (including 10% deduction for non-delivery of planning applications)
- a 4.75% increase allows the approximate amount of new homes required to be allocated (769 dwellings)
- a 6.5 % increase allows the approximate amount of new homes required to be allocated (769 dwellings)
The ‘Let’s Talk Plan Selby’ engagement allows the opportunity for stakeholders to comment further on these options and put forward alternative options.
The following table provides a comparison of the potential distribution of dwellings per DSV under each option.
|
Designated service village
|
Option 1: Proportionate dispersal across all designated service villages
|
Option 2: Distribution based on services and accessibility
|
Option 3: Growth based on avoiding Green Belt release
|
|
Appleton Roebuck
|
17
|
3
|
23
|
|
Byram/ Brotherton
|
48
|
58
|
0
|
|
Barlby/ Osgodby
|
101
|
122
|
139
|
|
Brayton
|
108
|
130
|
147
|
|
Carlton
|
39
|
33
|
54
|
|
Cawood
|
34
|
29
|
47
|
|
Church Fenton
|
29
|
24
|
39
|
|
Eggborough/Whitley
|
61
|
26
|
0
|
|
Escrick
|
19
|
23
|
0
|
|
Hambleton
|
39
|
33
|
53
|
|
Hemingbrough
|
39
|
33
|
54
|
|
Kellington
|
19
|
16
|
26
|
|
Monk Fryston/ Hillam
|
36
|
30
|
0
|
|
North Duffield
|
26
|
11
|
36
|
|
Riccall
|
50
|
60
|
68
|
|
South Milford
|
59
|
71
|
0
|
|
Thorpe Willoughby
|
61
|
73
|
83
|
|
Ulleskelf
|
18
|
7
|
24
|
|
Total
|
801
|
783
|
793
|
For the sake of consistency and comparison, the same calculation method as was commented on in the Plan Selby initial consultation is used here. However, some responses to the initial consultation from Parish Councils suggested an alternative calculation. This will be the subject of discussion with Parish Councils during the focused engagement.
Focused engagement consultation (29 June 2015 - 10 August 2015)
The focused engagement consultations undertaken between 29 June and 10 August 2015 were arranged to allow us to understand comments made in the initial consultation in more detail, talk about issues and options arising, and seek your views on a number of draft studies before they were finalised.
The growth options for the designated service villages (pdf / 38 MB) study was published as part of the focussed engagement. In responding to the focused engagement, people were asked to consider a range of specific questions relating to the growth options for the designated services villages study (pdf / 136 KB).
